The short answer
How do software and security teams rank for competitive cybersecurity keywords?
Pick terms by buyer intent and by what the ranking page actually earns, then build a page that solves the specific problem and earn links from relevant sources. Volume alone misleads: in our 20 October 2026 pull of ten terms for the US, "NIS2 compliance" has 1,100 searches a month but the top page earns an estimated 7,500 monthly visits across all its keywords, while "cybersecurity awareness" has the same volume and a top page that earns an estimated 250 (European Parliament and Council, 2022).
Which terms did we measure?
Ahrefs Keywords Explorer, US database, pulled on 20 October 2026 (Ahrefs, 2026). Each term’s SERP data was last refreshed between 1 and 20 October 2026. CPC converted from Ahrefs’ US cents to dollars.
Cybersecurity keyword economics (US, 20 October 2026)
Source: Ahrefs (2026), Keywords Explorer, US database, retrieved 20 October 2026. Estimates, not exact counts. Click a column header button to sort.
| Keyword | Monthly searches | Difficulty | CPC (USD) | Traffic potential |
|---|
Text version of the table.
| Keyword | Monthly searches | Difficulty (0 to 100) | CPC (USD) | Traffic potential |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| managed security services | 10,000 | 2 | $4.50 | 2,700 |
| cybersecurity software | 7,800 | 26 | $0.50 | 350 |
| endpoint detection and response | 3,500 | 56 | $8.00 | 6,900 |
| penetration testing services | 3,000 | 19 | $0.60 | 2,600 |
| ransomware protection | 2,400 | 53 | $0.50 | 2,600 |
| vulnerability scanning tools | 1,500 | 21 | $18.00 | 3,100 |
| nis2 compliance | 1,100 | 28 | $3.00 | 7,500 |
| dora compliance | 1,100 | 42 | $5.00 | 700 |
| cybersecurity awareness | 1,100 | 0 | $1.40 | 250 |
| soc 2 compliance software | 900 | 1 | $0.06 | 400 |
Claim strength: measured, Ahrefs, US, 20 October 2026. Estimates, not exact counts.
How to read it.
- “managed security services” shows difficulty 2 at 10,000 searches. We did not review the SERP for it, so we cannot say why the score is low. Treat a low score on a high-volume commercial term as a prompt to open the results page, not as an opportunity.
- “nis2 compliance” has the biggest gap between searches (1,100) and traffic potential (7,500). The top page ranks for many related queries, which is why a compliance page can be worth more than its headline keyword.
- “vulnerability scanning tools” has the highest CPC in the set ($18.00), which signals advertisers value the buyer. CPC is an advertiser metric, not a promise about organic revenue.
- Very low CPC values (for example $0.06 on “soc 2 compliance software”) often reflect thin paid-search data. Do not read them as “low value”.
What we could not reproduce. The earlier version of this article quoted ranges such as 60,500 to 740,000 monthly searches for “cybersecurity awareness” with difficulty 55 to 93, and dollar CPCs of about $50 to $79 for “cybersecurity software” and “managed security services”. We could not reproduce any of them in this pull. Differences in country, date or tool may explain part of it, and we cannot say which, so we replaced the figures.
What makes a keyword competitive?
Four things: the commercial value of the buyer, the authority and topical depth of the pages already ranking, how fast the vocabulary changes, and how closely the term ties to regulation or an audit date. Enterprise risk is high, so budgets are large and vendors compete hard. Compliance terms add a deadline, which raises intent.
How do search engines evaluate cybersecurity content?
Security is a field where wrong advice has operational cost, so show working experience: name the engineers, show methodology and date your claims. Our note on E-E-A-T and experience signals goes through it. Claim strength: opinion.
A simple intent check. Before you write, open the results for the term and count how many of the top ten pages satisfy the intent you plan to target. The SERP mismatch index is our own metric: SERP mismatch index = 1 - (top-10 pages satisfying your target intent / 10).
A value near 1 means the results do not satisfy your intent and a new page may fit. A value near 0 means the intent is well served and you need a stronger angle. Claim strength: opinion. It is a triage heuristic.
What strategies work?
Write for the specific problem. “NIS2 compliance requirements for digital service providers” attracts a buyer with a project, and “cybersecurity awareness” attracts a general audience (European Parliament and Council, 2022). Map control requirements to the responsible business unit and the remediation step.
Localise by law. A German page on HIPAA that ignores BSI C5 and NIS2 does not serve the reader (European Parliament and Council, 2022). Hreflang tells search engines which version is for which market, and our note on hreflang and international targeting covers the setup.
Build topical depth. A central NIS2 pillar can link to guides for transport, manufacturing and digital infrastructure providers (European Parliament and Council, 2022). Each page should answer a distinct question.
Earn relevant links. Create a technical asset worth citing, match it to publishers who cover the theme, keep claims accurate in outreach and secure placements on qualified publications. Label paid placements: Google’s spam policies (2026b) allow sponsorship links with rel=“sponsored” or rel=“nofollow” and list buying links for ranking as link spam. Link targets by theme:
| Keyword theme | Relevant link targets | Content focus |
|---|---|---|
| Regulation (NIS2, DORA) | Compliance and audit publishers, sector bodies | Requirement-by-requirement guides |
| Technology (EDR, vulnerability scanning) | Practitioner and engineering sites | Technical comparisons, methodology |
| Services (managed security, penetration testing) | Buyer-facing security and IT publications | Scope, process, evidence of results |
| Awareness and training | Education and HR publications | Practical programmes |
Keep content current. Date-stamp pages (“Updated: October 2026”) and make real changes when you do. A date without edits is noise.
What mistakes prevent high rankings?
- Thin or outdated content on a term where buyers need depth.
- Ignoring intent: an explainer page for a transactional term.
- Over-optimisation and scaled content with no practitioner input.
- Treating difficulty as a go signal without reading the SERP.
How do you track and adjust?
Track target-term rankings weekly in a rank tracker and impressions in Google Search Console. Fluctuations happen, so judge by a trend over weeks, not by one day. After each review, change the page, the links or the targeting, and change one thing at a time.
Key takeaways
- Choose keywords by intent and traffic potential, not by search volume. Traffic potential is the monthly organic traffic the top-ranking page earns from all its keywords.
- Ahrefs' difficulty score estimates how hard it is to reach the top 10, mainly from links. A low score does not mean the term is easy for a new domain.
- Compliance and regulation terms (NIS2, DORA, SOC 2) tie your page to a buyer with a deadline (European Parliament and Council, 2022).
- Ahrefs reports CPC in US cents. Our earlier version quoted dollar CPCs of $49.52 to $91 that we could not reproduce, and the figures below are much lower.
- Localise by regulation and law, not by translation: a US HIPAA guide translated into German does not cover BSI C5 or NIS2 (European Parliament and Council, 2022).
- Nobody can promise a position or a timeline.
References
- Ahrefs (2026) Keywords Explorer: US database, ten cybersecurity keywords [Dataset]. Retrieved via the Ahrefs connector (Accessed: 20 October 2026).
- European Parliament and Council (2022) 'Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of 14 December 2022 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union (NIS 2 Directive)', Official Journal of the European Union, L 333, 27 December. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2555/oj (Accessed: 20 October 2026).
- Google (2026b) 'Spam policies for Google web search', Google Search Central, last updated 28 August. Available at: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/essentials/spam-policies (Accessed: 20 October 2026).



