People also ask
In practice
The tracker is the campaign’s database, and the monthly report is its public face — which is why reports that cannot be traced back to URLs are disqualifying. The per-placement record: publisher and placement URL, target page, anchor, placement type, fee flag, qualification date, approval date, go-live date, index check date, and status (live / lost / replaced). The monthly report reads from it: go-lives this month against plan (the pacing number), cumulative live links by type and market, removals detected and their resolution, cost per live link trended, and the target-page view — which pages received links, because leadership thinks in pages, not publishers.
The go-live verification standard makes the number real: a link counts when it is present, pointing at the exact agreed target, on an indexed page — verified once at go-live and re-verified by monitoring thereafter. The reporting rhythm keeps stakeholders aligned: a fixed monthly pack (one page, traceable figures), a quarterly review layering the strategic view (referring-domain growth against competitors, anchor profile shape, publisher-list quality). What distinguishes a serious report: the removals are in it.
A report showing only go-lives is a marketing document; showing what dropped and how it was handled is an operations document — and the difference is exactly the difference between the vendor who owns the chain and the one who owns the invoice.
See also: Backlink monitoring and link tracking, Reporting cadence and stakeholder updates, Link building reports for leadership.
Checklist: Link Insertion Campaign.
Related service: Link building strategy.
